Inclusion and Exclusion in Mental Health: Understanding Dietary Lifestyles

Edited, created, and published By Nisa Pasha — Executive Political Health Guru, Peer Counselor, and Educator, MentalHealthRevival.org

In mental health practice, inclusion and exclusion refer to the ways individuals feel accepted, supported, rejected, or misunderstood within their social and treatment environments. These feelings strongly influence self-esteem, behavior, decision making, and overall wellness.

Dietary lifestyles—such as carnivore eating (meat-focused) or non-carnivore eating (vegetarian or plant-based)—can become part of a client’s identity, values, and emotional regulation strategy. When mental health consumers feel judged or pressured based on their diet, it may lead to emotional conflict, lowered motivation, or relapse in unhealthy behaviors.

Inclusion and Exclusion in Mental Health: Understanding Dietary Lifestyles

1. Inclusion: Acceptance of Dietary Identity

Inclusion means that a mental health consumer’s dietary preference, needs, and limitations are recognized and respected in treatment settings.

For example:

A vegetarian client is provided meals that honor their lifestyle.

A carnivore eater isn’t shamed or pressured to change if dietary change is not part of their treatment plan.

A person with digestive sensitivities is offered alternative options that support their mental and physical comfort.

Benefits of Inclusion for Mental Health

Greater trust in the treatment environment

Reduced anxiety around food

Increased willingness to participate in wellness planning

Improved self-confidence and emotional stability

A sense of safety and belonging during recovery

Inclusion empowers clients to make consistent and intentional dietary choices, which supports mood regulation, energy balance, and behavioral control.

2. Exclusion: Judgment or Invalidation of Dietary Choices

Exclusion happens when a consumer’s dietary lifestyle is dismissed, criticized, or not accommodated. This can happen unintentionally when programs provide limited food options or when staff are unfamiliar with plant-based needs.

Examples of Exclusion

A vegetarian client repeatedly receives meals containing meat.

A carnivore eater is told their protein intake “is wrong” without proper education.

A client’s cultural or spiritual dietary practices are ignored.

A person with digestive issues is not given safe food substitutes.

Emotional and Behavioral Impact of Exclusion

Feeling misunderstood or marginalized

Increased irritability or behavioral response

Loss of trust in the program

Reduced engagement in treatment

Nutritional imbalance affecting mood and cognitive function

Exclusion triggers internal conflict, especially for clients in recovery who rely on structure and stability.

3. The Dietary Conflict: Carnivore vs. Non-Carnivore Mental Health Consumers

Mental health consumers often experience conflicted feelings when their dietary identity does not align with their environment or the expectations placed upon them. This conflict can heighten emotional distress.

Carnivore Eaters: Strengths & Challenges

Strengths

High protein intake can support energy and cognitive sharpness.

Familiar comfort foods may reduce stress for some clients.

Challenges

Heavy meat intake can cause sluggishness or irritability in some individuals.

Reducing meat may trigger resistance or emotional discomfort.

Social pressure to avoid meat can create frustration or anger.

Non-Carnivore Eaters (Vegetarians): Strengths & Challenges

Strengths

Plant-based diets support lighter digestion, improved clarity, and emotional balance.

Clients often feel a strong sense of self-discipline and identity.

Vegetarianism may align with cultural, spiritual, or wellness values.

Challenges

Limited plant-based options in facilities can lead to under-eating and fatigue.

Misunderstanding from staff can cause clients to feel excluded.

High personal discipline may become stressful without proper support.

4. The Core Difference in Mental Health Conflict

The central conflict between carnivore and non-carnivore eaters in mental health settings is identity and emotional regulation, not just food.

Carnivore Eaters

May feel:

judged for eating meat

pressured to change

misunderstood culturally or personally

Non-Carnivore Eaters

May feel:

excluded when plant-based meals aren’t provided

frustrated with lack of support

that their health values are minimized

Both groups benefit from respect, flexibility, and informed nutritional guidance.

5. Why Inclusion Matters Most

Mental health consumers thrive when they feel:

Seen

Respected

Supported

Empowered in their choices

When dietary preferences are honored, it contributes to:

stabilized mood

reduced anger

improved behavioral control

stronger self-esteem

increased willingness to participate in treatment

better long-term wellness outcomes

When consumers feel respected, they are more likely to stay consistent with healthy eating, maintain recovery progress, and build independent living skills based on stable routines.

Conclusion

The concept of inclusion and exclusion in mental health directly affects how consumers experience their dietary choices—whether carnivore or vegetarian. When programs support each consumer’s lifestyle without judgment, clients gain emotional safety, mental clarity, and the internal motivation needed for long-term change. Understanding these differences allows providers to create environments where all individuals can succeed in recovery, wellness, and independent living.

Here is a theoretical final thoughts and conclusion written from an instructive, intellectual, and motivational empowerment standpoint, integrating identity, dietary choice, mental health wellness, and the principles of inclusion/exclusion.

Final Theoretical Thoughts & Conclusion

From an Instructive, Intellectual, and Motivational Empowerment Standpoint

In examining the relationship between dietary identity, mental health stability, and the psychological forces of inclusion and exclusion, one central truth emerges: the way individuals are treated for their choices—especially around food—shapes the trajectory of their emotional, cognitive, and behavioral wellbeing. Diet becomes more than nutrition; it becomes a representation of self-understanding, personal boundaries, and internal regulation.

The theoretical framework suggests that when mental health consumers—whether carnivore or vegetarian—are provided environments that include them, honor their autonomy, and respect their expressed needs, they experience higher levels of internal harmony. Under these conditions, mood stabilization, behavioral discipline, and long-term recovery become more attainable.

In contrast, systems that dismiss or exclude dietary preferences inadvertently create psychological tension, contributing to instability, emotional misalignment, irritability, and distrust.

At a deeper level, the conflict is not about meat versus plants.

It is about dignity versus erasure.

Respect versus neglect.

Empowerment versus vulnerability.

From this understanding, a theoretical analysis shows:

• Inclusion strengthens the individual’s identity, allowing them to show up in treatment with confidence and self-respect.

• Exclusion fractures identity, leading to emotional withdrawal, frustration, or behavioral responses.

• Dietary structure becomes a stabilizing ritual, supporting consistency, discipline, and internal order.

• Autonomous choice is the foundation of mental empowerment, teaching clients that they can control their health trajectory.

When consumers take responsibility for their dietary path—whether carnivore, vegetarian, or a modified method—they are practicing self-leadership, which is a critical predictor of long-term independent living success.

The empowerment comes not merely from what they eat, but from why and how they choose it.

In this context, dietary planning becomes a tool for:

• restoring personal agency,

• strengthening decision-making pathways,

• enhancing emotional clarity,

• reducing impulsivity,

• and reinforcing boundaries with self and others.

These cognitive and behavioral gains support greater resilience, improved communication, and the ability to engage with community systems without internalizing stigma or judgment.

Ultimately, the theoretical conclusion is clear:

True wellness emerges when individuals are empowered to choose their path, supported in their differences, and given the space to build their identity without conflict.

Diet becomes a portal to mastery—of the mind, the emotions, and the self.

Inclusion becomes a healing force.

Exclusion becomes a cautionary lesson.

And personal dietary identity becomes a bridge toward balance, stability, and the long-term transformation required for mental health recovery and independent living.

This motivational and intellectual perspective affirms that every person has the capacity to create harmony in their life through structure, clarity, intentional decision-making, and the courage to honor what nourishes them—physically, emotionally, and spiritually.

Keywords: Inclusion, Exclusion, Dietary lifestyles, Mental health

If you have specific questions or concerns, feel free to share!

Hope you found this insightful while grasping the key components!

Please contact me if you would like to chat in a peer counseling session, revolving around this post or another topic.

Mental health revival seeking to inspire a unique perception of mental health awareness